

Match Prediction
PBKS is game mein table ke top par aa rahe hain 13 points ke saath aur abhi playoff zone mein hain, jabki GT 10 points ke saath 5th par hai aur top four ko chase kar rahe hain. PBKS ka last game Rajasthan Royals ke against 222 defend na kar paane ke saath khatam hua. GT back-to-back wins ke baad aa rahi hai, aur yahan ek bada win unhe top four mein push kar sakta hai.
Toss & Conditions
The match is on pitch No. 5 in Ahmedabad, and it is expected to be high-scoring based on the only IPL game on this surface this season. Over the last two IPL seasons and the recent World Cup, this pitch has favoured fast bowlers on average compared to spinners, with a similar economy rate but a much better bowling average for pace.
Head-to-Head
PBKS last three meetings mein 2-1 se lead karti hai. Most recent clash mein, PBKS ne 163 ka target chase karke 3 wickets se jeeta, 5 balls remaining ke saath. Game ka turning point ek tight finish tha jahan PBKS late mein wickets in hand ke saath line ke paar nikal gayi. In teen games mein results dono taraf swing hue hain—ek GT win 3 wickets se aur do PBKS wins.
Gujarat Titans
GT IPL regular season mein 10 points ke saath 5th par hai. Unhone apne last two matches jeete hain, including ek chase jahan woh 25 balls remaining ke saath jeete. Unka most recent loss RCB ke against 5-wicket defeat tha, 7 balls remaining ke saath.
Punjab Kings
PBKS IPL regular season mein 13 points ke saath 1st par hai aur abhi playoff zone mein hai. Unhone last three mein se two matches jeete hain, but latest match loss mein end hua kyunki woh 222 defend nahi kar paaye. Usse just pehle, unhone Delhi Capitals ke against chase jeeta tha 7 balls remaining ke saath.
Playing XI
News & Facts
- PBKS failed to defend 222 in their previous game against Rajasthan Royals, with Arshdeep Singh returning figures of 1 for 68.
- Against RCB, Rashid Khan, Arshad Khan and Jason Holder took seven wickets between them after Kagiso Rabada and Mohammed Siraj went for runs.
- Jason Holder’s last game vs RCB included 2 for 29, three catches, and 12 runs in the chase.
- Washington Sundar has 169 runs in nine games at an average of 28.16 and a strike rate of 143.22, and has bowled 31 deliveries in the tournament.
- In the last six games, Mohammed Siraj has taken seven wickets at an economy of 6.7 and a strike rate of 19.7.
Key Stats
Verdict
All four models PBKS ko favour karte hain, model average PBKS 60% par hai (range 57–64%). Bookmakers bhi PBKS ki taraf lean kar rahe hain, PBKS ko 54% (1.77) aur GT ko 46% (2.07) price kiya gaya hai. Key stats overall PBKS ko 5-2 se favour karte hain, mainly unke points, NRR, Elo, aur last-three head-to-head edge ki wajah se. Match ka decision likely is baat par hinge karega ki PBKS ke bowling issues, GT ki top order-heavy side ke against kitna hold up kar paate hain.
Holder rips out the spine
Jason Holder’s 4/24 turned a flat-looking innings into a chaseable target, and Gujarat Titans just about held their nerve to beat Punjab Kings by 4 wickets with one ball remaining. Punjab briefly threatened to flip it late, but Titans’ top-order base kept the chase on track even as wickets fell in clumps through the middle.
Powerplay damage, then control
The match swung hardest in Punjab’s powerplay, where they stumbled to 35/3 and spent the rest of the innings trying to repair. Even with a 79-run stand between Suryansh Shedge and Marcus Stoinis dragging them back, the early holes meant Punjab couldn’t fully cash in at the death, finishing 163/9. By contrast, Titans’ 58/1 powerplay gave them a cushion that absorbed a mid-innings wobble and left a manageable finish.
Sudharsan anchors, Shedge counterpunches
Sudharsan’s 57 off 41 underpinned the pursuit, and his 52-run partnership with Jos Buttler set the tone for a chase that always had a path. For Punjab, Shedge’s 57 off 29 was the innings’ spark, turning a crawl into a contest alongside Stoinis’ 40. But Holder’s strikes at key moments — including the middle-overs squeeze that forced Punjab into catch-up mode — proved the difference when the finish tightened.
Why the script flipped
Pre-match numbers leaned Punjab: better recent away results, stronger ratings, and a perceived edge in match-ups. But those advantages depend on getting a functional batting platform and defending with control at the top. Punjab did neither. Their top order was dislodged early, and Titans’ chase was built on a more stable start, with Sai Sudharsan’s tempo ensuring the required rate never ran away even when the middle overs slowed.
GTGujarat Titans
158/6
RCRoyal Challengers Bengaluru
155/10
GTGujarat Titans
162/2
CSChennai Super Kings
158/7
RCRoyal Challengers Bengaluru
206/5
GTGujarat Titans
205/3
GTGujarat Titans
100/10
MIMumbai Indians
199/5
GTGujarat Titans
181/5
KKKolkata Knight Riders
180/10
LSLucknow Super Giants
164/8
GTGujarat Titans
165/3
DCDelhi Capitals
209/8
GTGujarat Titans
210/4
GTGujarat Titans
204/8
RRRajasthan Royals
210/6
PBPunjab Kings
165/7
GTGujarat Titans
162/6
GTGujarat Titans
208/6
MIMumbai Indians
228/5
GT3
PB4
PBPunjab Kings
165/7
GTGujarat Titans
162/6
GTGujarat Titans
232/5
PBPunjab Kings
243/5
PBPunjab Kings
142/10
GTGujarat Titans
146/7
GTGujarat Titans
199/4
PBPunjab Kings
200/7
PBPunjab Kings
153/8
GTGujarat Titans
154/4
GTGujarat Titans
143/8
PBPunjab Kings
145/2
PBPunjab Kings
189/9
GTGujarat Titans
190/4
PBPunjab Kings
222/4
RRRajasthan Royals
228/4
DCDelhi Capitals
264/2
PBPunjab Kings
265/4
PBPunjab Kings
254/7
LSLucknow Super Giants
200/5
MIMumbai Indians
195/6
PBPunjab Kings
198/3
PBPunjab Kings
223/4
SRSunrisers Hyderabad
219/6
CSChennai Super Kings
209/5
PBPunjab Kings
210/5
PBPunjab Kings
165/7
GTGujarat Titans
162/6
RCRoyal Challengers Bengaluru
190/9
PBPunjab Kings
184/7
PBPunjab Kings
207/5
MIMumbai Indians
203/6
PBPunjab Kings
101/10
RCRoyal Challengers Bengaluru
106/2
PBKS
8
6-1
13
RCB
9
6-3
12
SRH
9
6-3
12
RR
10
6-4
12
GT
9
5-4
10
CSK
9
4-5
8
DC
9
4-5
8
KKR
8
2-5
5
MI
9
2-7
4
LSG
8
2-6
4
PBKS
8
6
1
1
+1.043
13
RCB
9
6
3
—
+1.420
12
SRH
9
6
3
—
+0.832
12
RR
10
6
4
—
+0.510
12
GT
9
5
4
—
-0.192
10
CSK
9
4
5
—
+0.005
8
DC
9
4
5
—
-0.895
8
KKR
8
2
5
1
-0.751
5
MI
9
2
7
—
-0.803
4
LSG
8
2
6
—
-1.106
4
PBKSWWWWL
RCBWLWWL
SRHWWWWW
RRLWLWL
GTWLLWW
CSKWLWLW
DCWLLLW
KKRLLLWW
MILWLLL
LSGLLLLL
