

Match Prediction
Worcestershire T20B regular season mein 16 points ke saath 10th par hain, record 4W-4L aur -0.581 NRR. Kent 16 points ke saath 8th par hain, same 4W-4L record ke saath, lekin +0.075 NRR. Dono teams apne most recent matches mein wins ke baad aa rahi hain. Identical points ke saath, yeh game seedha chance hai logjam todne ka.
Toss & Conditions
Head-to-Head
In teams ke beech pehle koi meetings nahi hui hain.
Worcestershire
Worcestershire T20B regular season mein 16 points ke saath 10th par hain. Unke last three results mein bounce-back pattern dikhta hai: Somerset ke against 36-run win, usse pehle Warwickshire se 59-run loss aur Northamptonshire ke against D/L defeat 6 wickets se, 12 balls remaining ke saath. Most recent win 180/5 defend karne aur Somerset ko 144/9 tak restrict karne par built tha.
Kent
Kent T20B regular season mein 16 points ke saath 8th par hain. Unke last three games mein do tight finishes rahe: Hampshire ke against 7-wicket win, 8 balls remaining ke saath, aur Essex ke against 3-run loss. Most recent win 176/6 chase karke 181/3 banane ke baad aaya.
Playing XI
Key Stats
Verdict
Models split hain, but thoda lean Kent ki taraf hai: model average KEN 52% vs WOR 48%, aur individual systems mein consensus split. Bookmakers bhi near parity dikhate hain, pricing WOR 50% (1.90) vs KEN 50% (1.90). Key stats overall Worcestershire ko 3-2 edge dete hain, but Kent ka NRR advantage aur slightly better death economy yeh suggest karta hai ki late-overs control swing factor ho sakta hai. Dono 16 points par hain aur dono wins ke baad aa rahe hain—back end par execution hi decide karega.
Raza flips the script
Sikandar Raza was the hinge of the night: first rebuilding with Adam Hose, then returning to puncture Kent’s chase before it could breathe. Worcestershire’s 142/7 never looked extravagant after a slow start, but it became more than enough once Kent’s top order stumbled and the middle order vanished. The hosts sealed it by 83 runs, with the chase ending in a heap at 59.
Middle overs: Kent implode
The game was decided in Kent’s middle overs, where a manageable pursuit turned into damage limitation. After 32/3 in the powerplay, Kent lost seven wickets for 27 runs in the middle phase, crawling at 3.3 an over and never reaching a “death” chase at all. Worcestershire, by contrast, did their work in the same period: from 27/2 they surged through the middle to add 85/1, with the Hose-Raza stand of 69 providing the only sustained momentum in the match.
Hose-Raza stand, Mir closes
Hose’s 48 off 41 gave Worcestershire a base when the powerplay had dragged, but it was Raza’s 43 off 31 that changed the tempo without reckless risk. Milnes’ 3/20 ensured Worcestershire didn’t run away at the death, yet the damage was already done. Then Raza (2/8) and Usama Mir (2/14) squeezed and struck, turning Kent’s brief powerplay resistance into a collapse that never recovered.
Pre-match logic meets chaos
With models leaning Kent on late-overs control and marginal death-overs numbers, the expectation was a tight finish decided at the back end. Instead, the contest was settled long before that: Worcestershire’s middle-overs acceleration took the pressure off a modest total, and Kent’s batting never got stable enough for their death-overs edge to matter. Even with Matt Milnes keeping Worcestershire in check late, the chase demanded composure—Kent offered none once early wickets exposed a fragile core.
WOWorcestershire
180/5
SOSomerset
144/9
WAWarwickshire
224/10
WOWorcestershire
165/7
NONorthamptonshire
162/4
WOWorcestershire
154/5
GLGloucestershire
148/7
WOWorcestershire
145/10
WOWorcestershire
168/8
GLGlamorgan
141/10
WOWorcestershire
142/4
WAWarwickshire
141/10
WOWorcestershire
91/10
NONorthamptonshire
191/10
LELeicestershire
164/4
WOWorcestershire
188/9
WOWorcestershire
206/7
NONottinghamshire
161/10
WOWorcestershire
176/4
LELeicestershire
173/6
NOR
8
8-0
32
HAM
8
6-2
24
NOT
9
6-3
24
YOR
9
5-3
22
SUR
8
5-3
20
GLO
8
5-3
20
GLA
8
5-3
20
ESS
9
5-4
20
WOR
9
5-4
20
KEN
9
4-5
16
LAN
9
4-5
16
DUR
8
3-5
12
WAR
9
3-6
12
SOM
8
3-5
12
LEI
8
3-5
12
DER
8
2-5
10
SUS
9
2-7
8
MID
8
1-7
4
NOR
8
8
0
—
+2.142
32
HAM
8
6
2
—
+0.594
24
NOT
9
6
3
—
+0.199
24
YOR
9
5
3
—
+0.750
22
SUR
8
5
3
—
+0.734
20
GLO
8
5
3
—
+0.526
20
GLA
8
5
3
—
+0.467
20
ESS
9
5
4
—
+0.149
20
WOR
9
5
4
—
-0.043
20
KEN
9
4
5
—
-0.418
16
LAN
9
4
5
—
-0.605
16
DUR
8
3
5
—
+0.396
12
WAR
9
3
6
—
+0.209
12
SOM
8
3
5
—
-0.563
12
LEI
8
3
5
—
-1.344
12
DER
8
2
5
—
+0.446
10
SUS
9
2
7
—
-1.487
8
MID
8
1
7
—
-2.002
4
NORWWWWW
HAMWWWWL
NOTWWWWW
YORWLLDW
SURLWLWW
GLOWWWLL
GLAWLWWW
ESSWWLLW
WORLLLWW
KENLLLWL
LANLWWWL
DURLLLWL
WARLWWWL
SOMLLLWL
LEIWWWLL
DERWLLDL
SUSLWLLL
MIDLLLLL
