

Match Prediction
Nottinghamshire T20B Regular Season me 20 points ke saath 5th par hain, 5W-3L record aur +0.218 NRR ke saath. Lancashire 16 points ke saath 11th par hain, 4W-4L record aur -0.679 NRR ke saath. Dono teams three straight wins ke momentum me hain, but standings ka pressure Lancashire par zyada hai gap close karne ke liye.
Toss & Conditions
Head-to-Head
Last three meetings me Lancashire 2 wins to 1 se lead karte hain. Most recent clash me Lancashire ne 208/4 set kiya aur Nottinghamshire ko 172/9 tak restrict karke 36 runs se jeet gaye. Defining feature ye tha ki chase karte hue Nottinghamshire 9 down finish hue, jisse pursuit stall ho gayi. Pattern narrow hai but clear: recent times me is matchup me Lancashire ka upper hand raha hai.
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire T20B Regular Season me 20 points aur 5W-3L record ke saath 5th par hain. Wo three-match winning run par hain, jiska highlight Leicestershire ke against 74-run win tha. Unme se do wins chases the, including Kent ke against four-wicket win with eight balls remaining.
Lancashire
Lancashire T20B Regular Season me 16 points aur 4W-4L record ke saath 11th par hain. Wo bhi three-match winning run par hain, aur unki latest win Derbyshire ke against four-run finish thi. Is streak me do chases include hain—ek seven balls remaining ke saath seal hua aur ek five balls remaining ke saath.
Playing XI
Key Stats
Verdict
All four models Nottinghamshire ko favour karte hain, average NOT 52% vs LAN 48% hai. Bookmakers is lean se differ kar rahe hain, unhone isko dead heat price kiya hai: NOT 50% (1.90) vs LAN 50% (1.90). Key stats overall Nottinghamshire ko 5-2 se favour karte hain, mainly unki stronger season position aur NRR profile ki wajah se. Lancashire ka edge recent head-to-head aur better death-overs economy hai, to late-innings phase hi swing point banega.
Munsey sets up one-run heist
George Munsey’s measured 51 off 39 became the difference in a finish that tightened with every ball, as Nottinghamshire edged Lancashire by 1 run. Lancashire looked on course when Liam Livingstone counterpunched and the asking rate stayed manageable, but the chase turned into a scramble late. With the target in sight, Nottinghamshire held their nerve through the final over to close out 181/6 with Lancashire stranded on 180/7.
Lancashire’s death-overs stall
The game swung in the last five overs. Lancashire were 151/4 after 15, needing 31 from 30 with set hitters, but Nottinghamshire’s bowlers squeezed the boundary options and forced risk. The death phase told the story: Lancashire managed only 29/3 at 7.2 an over, a sharp drop from their 9.5-rate middle overs. That slowdown made every dot ball in the 19th and 20th overs feel like a wicket.
Munsey, Patterson-White deliver
Munsey didn’t explode; he constructed, ensuring Nottinghamshire had a defendable platform before the late push. Liam Patterson-White then delivered the key control spell, taking 2 for 24 in 3 overs and breaking Lancashire’s rhythm when the chase was building. Livingstone’s 47 kept Lancashire ahead for long stretches, but once the squeeze began, boundaries dried up and the final run proved unreachable.
Pre-match swing point arrives
The build-up hinted this would be decided late: Nottinghamshire’s overall profile and recent form suggested they’d stay in the contest, while Lancashire’s better death-overs numbers offered them the clearest path to steal it. Instead, the roles flipped. Nottinghamshire’s innings stayed afloat through the middle and finished at 10 an over at the death, while Lancashire’s chase lost momentum exactly when their matchup was meant to be strongest.
LELeicestershire
135/10
NONottinghamshire
209/4
KEKent
184/7
NONottinghamshire
187/6
NONottinghamshire
183/6
DEDerbyshire
173/9
NONottinghamshire
143/7
WAWarwickshire
139/10
NONottinghamshire
157/4
DUDurham
156/8
DEDerbyshire
234/4
NONottinghamshire
211/6
LALancashire
208/4
NONottinghamshire
172/9
NONottinghamshire
167/7
YOYorkshire
169/3
NONottinghamshire
127/6
LALancashire
126/10
WOWorcestershire
206/7
NONottinghamshire
161/10
NO3
LA7
LALancashire
208/4
NONottinghamshire
172/9
NONottinghamshire
127/6
LALancashire
126/10
LALancashire
216/3
NONottinghamshire
169/10
LALancashire
136/2
NONottinghamshire
131/7
NONottinghamshire
153/8
LALancashire
155/4
NONottinghamshire
149/5
LALancashire
145/10
LALancashire
208/4
NONottinghamshire
186/5
LALancashire
181/4
NONottinghamshire
179/7
NONottinghamshire
91/10
LALancashire
178/7
NONottinghamshire
173/6
LALancashire
166/7
DEDerbyshire
202/10
LALancashire
205/10
LELeicestershire
156/7
LALancashire
160/5
DUDurham
128/2
LALancashire
130/3
LALancashire
201/8
GLGlamorgan
202/8
YOYorkshire
213/7
LALancashire
107/10
LALancashire
145/9
LELeicestershire
146/8
LALancashire
208/4
NONottinghamshire
172/9
SUSurrey
213/6
LALancashire
154/10
LALancashire
159/10
SOSomerset
182/7
LALancashire
156/7
KEKent
153/10
NOR
8
8-0
32
HAM
8
6-2
24
NOT
9
6-3
24
YOR
9
5-3
22
SUR
8
5-3
20
GLO
8
5-3
20
GLA
8
5-3
20
ESS
9
5-4
20
WOR
9
5-4
20
KEN
9
4-5
16
LAN
9
4-5
16
DUR
8
3-5
12
WAR
9
3-6
12
SOM
8
3-5
12
LEI
8
3-5
12
DER
8
2-5
10
SUS
9
2-7
8
MID
8
1-7
4
NOR
8
8
0
—
+2.142
32
HAM
8
6
2
—
+0.594
24
NOT
9
6
3
—
+0.199
24
YOR
9
5
3
—
+0.750
22
SUR
8
5
3
—
+0.734
20
GLO
8
5
3
—
+0.526
20
GLA
8
5
3
—
+0.467
20
ESS
9
5
4
—
+0.149
20
WOR
9
5
4
—
-0.043
20
KEN
9
4
5
—
-0.418
16
LAN
9
4
5
—
-0.605
16
DUR
8
3
5
—
+0.396
12
WAR
9
3
6
—
+0.209
12
SOM
8
3
5
—
-0.563
12
LEI
8
3
5
—
-1.344
12
DER
8
2
5
—
+0.446
10
SUS
9
2
7
—
-1.487
8
MID
8
1
7
—
-2.002
4
NORWWWWW
HAMWWWWL
NOTWWWWW
YORWLLDW
SURLWLWW
GLOWWWLL
GLAWLWWW
ESSWWLLW
WORLLLWW
KENLLLWL
LANLWWWL
DURLLLWL
WARLWWWL
SOMLLLWL
LEIWWWLL
DERWLLDL
SUSLWLLL
MIDLLLLL
