

Match Prediction
Leicestershire T20B Regular Season me 13th par hain 12 points ke saath, 3W-4L record aur -0.994 NRR ke saath. Nottinghamshire 7th par hain 16 points ke saath, 4W-3L record aur -0.293 NRR ke saath. Points aur net run rate me gap clear hai, but recent head-to-head LEI ki taraf jhuka hua hai. Ye game test karega ki NOT ki stronger season position ek tricky opponent ke against kitni hold karti hai.
Toss & Conditions
Head-to-Head
Last three meetings me Leicestershire 2-1 se lead karta hai. Sabse recent clash me Nottinghamshire ne 1 wicket se jeeta, 1 ball remaining ke saath, target chase karke last-ball finish me. Match ek tight chase ban gaya tha jahan NOT ko line cross karne ke liye deep tak batting karni padi. In teen matches me results swing hue hain—LEI ke 2 wins, but margins close hi rahe.
Leicestershire
Leicestershire T20B Regular Season me 13th par hai 12 points ke saath. Unke last three games me do wins ke baad ek defeat aayi, jo dikhata hai ki setbacks ke baad ye jaldi respond kar sakte hain. Sabse clear signal recent loss vs Lancashire hai, jahan LEI 5 wickets se haara, 7 balls remaining ke saath.
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire T20B Regular Season me 7th par hai 16 points ke saath. Ye three-match winning run ke saath aa rahe hain, aur har win ya to chase me aayi hai ya phir tight finish me. Sabse telling result latest win vs Kent hai, jahan NOT ne successful chase karke 4 wickets se jeeta, 8 balls remaining ke saath.
Playing XI
Key Stats
Verdict
All four models Nottinghamshire ko favour karte hain, average projection NOT 60% (range 54–68%) hai. Bookmakers bhi agree karte hain, NOT ko 59% (1.60) aur LEI ko 41% (2.30) price kar rahe hain. Key stats overall NOT ko 5-1 se lean karte hain, mainly unki stronger season position aur better run-rate profile ki wajah se. Swing factor ye hai ki kya LEI ka recent head-to-head edge NOT ki current winning streak ko disrupt kar paata hai.
Ali’s burst kills the chase
Mohammad Ali turned a big chase into a scramble, striking early and often as Leicestershire’s reply unravelled. Nottinghamshire’s 209/4 had given them room to attack, and Ali made it count, finishing with 3/20 in 3.5 overs as Leicestershire were bowled out for 135 in 17.5 overs to lose by 74 runs. There was a flicker of resistance through Rehan Ahmed, but the required rate and falling wickets kept dragging the hosts back under.
Powerplay wickets set the tone
The match was effectively won in the first six overs of Leicestershire’s innings. Chasing 10.45 an over, they stumbled to 48/4 in the powerplay, losing the freedom to target the middle overs. Even when the scoring steadied, the damage was already done: they reached 75/4 after 10 overs, still needing a surge that never arrived. Nottinghamshire’s bowlers kept their lengths full enough to force risky hits, and the chase’s final phase fizzled to just 11 runs for two wickets.
Munsey anchors, Linde detonates
George Munsey’s 76 off 52 balls gave Nottinghamshire a base that survived the quieter middle, and his stand of 69 with George Linde was the innings’ key bridge. Then Linde flipped the match in a handful of deliveries, blasting 55 off 22 at a strike rate of 250 to blow open the death overs. For Leicestershire, Rehan’s 45 off 23 briefly hinted at a counterpunch, but Ali’s spell ensured it never became a partnership-led chase.
Pre-match edge becomes on-field control
Nottinghamshire came in with the stronger recent run and a profile built around controlling phases, and that’s exactly how the game played out. Their batting didn’t just start fast; it finished faster, with 65 runs in the last four overs, turning a good total into a daunting one. Leicestershire’s recent head-to-head success needed a clean powerplay and a stable chase, but the early collapse meant they were always chasing the game’s tempo rather than the target.
LELeicestershire
156/7
LALancashire
160/5
LELeicestershire
147/8
YOYorkshire
135/10
SUSussex
179/10
LELeicestershire
180/6
LALancashire
145/9
LELeicestershire
146/8
LELeicestershire
145/10
DEDerbyshire
230/5
DUDurham
150/4
LELeicestershire
148/8
LELeicestershire
164/4
WOWorcestershire
188/9
LELeicestershire
185/10
YOYorkshire
188/8
WOWorcestershire
176/4
LELeicestershire
173/6
LELeicestershire
173/4
NONorthamptonshire
171/7
LE4
NO5
NONottinghamshire
189/9
LELeicestershire
188/2
LELeicestershire
160/6
NONottinghamshire
156/10
LELeicestershire
161/5
NONottinghamshire
160/6
NONottinghamshire
168/8
LELeicestershire
164/8
LELeicestershire
143/8
NONottinghamshire
165/8
NONottinghamshire
123/10
LELeicestershire
170/10
LELeicestershire
123/10
NONottinghamshire
127/5
LELeicestershire
177/8
NONottinghamshire
173/10
NONottinghamshire
156/4
LELeicestershire
154/10
NONottinghamshire
139/7
LELeicestershire
139/7
KEKent
184/7
NONottinghamshire
187/6
NONottinghamshire
183/6
DEDerbyshire
173/9
NONottinghamshire
143/7
WAWarwickshire
139/10
NONottinghamshire
157/4
DUDurham
156/8
DEDerbyshire
234/4
NONottinghamshire
211/6
LALancashire
208/4
NONottinghamshire
172/9
NONottinghamshire
167/7
YOYorkshire
169/3
NONottinghamshire
127/6
LALancashire
126/10
WOWorcestershire
206/7
NONottinghamshire
161/10
NONottinghamshire
159/3
DUDurham
156/10
NOR
8
8-0
32
HAM
8
6-2
24
NOT
9
6-3
24
YOR
9
5-3
22
SUR
8
5-3
20
GLO
8
5-3
20
GLA
8
5-3
20
ESS
9
5-4
20
WOR
9
5-4
20
KEN
9
4-5
16
LAN
9
4-5
16
DUR
8
3-5
12
WAR
9
3-6
12
SOM
8
3-5
12
LEI
8
3-5
12
DER
8
2-5
10
SUS
9
2-7
8
MID
8
1-7
4
NOR
8
8
0
—
+2.142
32
HAM
8
6
2
—
+0.594
24
NOT
9
6
3
—
+0.199
24
YOR
9
5
3
—
+0.750
22
SUR
8
5
3
—
+0.734
20
GLO
8
5
3
—
+0.526
20
GLA
8
5
3
—
+0.467
20
ESS
9
5
4
—
+0.149
20
WOR
9
5
4
—
-0.043
20
KEN
9
4
5
—
-0.418
16
LAN
9
4
5
—
-0.605
16
DUR
8
3
5
—
+0.396
12
WAR
9
3
6
—
+0.209
12
SOM
8
3
5
—
-0.563
12
LEI
8
3
5
—
-1.344
12
DER
8
2
5
—
+0.446
10
SUS
9
2
7
—
-1.487
8
MID
8
1
7
—
-2.002
4
NORWWWWW
HAMWWWWL
NOTWWWWW
YORWLLDW
SURLWLWW
GLOWWWLL
GLAWLWWW
ESSWWLLW
WORLLLWW
KENLLLWL
LANLWWWL
DURLLLWL
WARLWWWL
SOMLLLWL
LEIWWWLL
DERWLLDL
SUSLWLLL
MIDLLLLL
