Toss & Conditions

Head-to-Head

Last do head-to-head meetings mein Warwickshire 2-0 se aage hai. Sabse recent meeting last season mein, Warwickshire ne 165/9 defend kiya aur Hampshire ko 149/6 par rok kar 16 runs se jeet liya. Match ka decision yahi tha ki Warwickshire ne Hampshire ko target se short rakha, despite Hampshire ne poore 20 overs batting ki. Dono recent meetings mein, Warwickshire consistently upar nikla hai—relatively tight, mid-margin results mein.

HAHampshire W 149/6

WAWarwickshire W 165/9

2025-07-13 · WAR-W won by 16 runs

WAWarwickshire W 178/7

HAHampshire W 165/7

2025-06-15 · WAR-W won by 13 runs

Warwickshire W

Warwickshire Women T20BW regular season mein 12 points ke saath 7th par hain. Unke last three matches uneven form dikhate hain: Essex ke against win ke baad Yorkshire aur Surrey ke against close losses. Sabse telling result Surrey wali defeat thi, jahan Warwickshire ne 180/5 banaya, phir bhi haar gaye kyunki Surrey ne chase 30 balls remaining ke saath complete kar diya.

WAWarwickshire W 180/5

SUSurrey W 183/4

2026-07-08 · SUR-Women won by 6 wickets (with 30 balls remaining)

WAWarwickshire W 161/3

YOYorkshire W 165/5

2026-07-05 · YOR won by 5 wickets (with 3 balls remaining)

WAWarwickshire W 119/5

ESEssex W 116/8

2026-07-01 · WAR-W won by 5 wickets (with 24 balls remaining)

Hampshire W

Hampshire Women T20BW regular season mein 32 points ke saath 1st par hain aur abhi playoff zone mein hain. Woh three-match winning streak par aa rahe hain, jisme The Blaze ke against 23-run win bhi hai. Control ka sabse clear signal Lancashire wala game tha, jahan woh 9 wickets se jeete, 33 balls remaining ke saath.

HAHampshire W 151/8

TBThe Blaze W 128/8

2026-07-08 · HAM-Women won by 23 runs

HAHampshire W 135/1

LALancashire W 131/10

2026-07-05 · HAM-W won by 9 wickets (with 33 balls remaining)

HAHampshire W 131/2

DUDurham W 128/7

2026-06-28 · HAM-W won by 8 wickets (with 19 balls remaining)

Playing XI

Key Stats

Verdict

Chaaro models Hampshire ko favour karte hain, average projection HAM-W 65% (range 57–72%). Bookmakers bhi agree karte hain: HAM-W 65% (1.45) vs WAR-W 35% (2.65). Key stats bhi Hampshire ki taraf lean karte hain—overall 6-2—unki stronger season position aur recent momentum ki wajah se. Warwickshire ka main counterweight unka 2-0 head-to-head edge hai, toh ye matchup Hampshire ki table dominance ko test karta hai ek aisi team ke against jo unhe already do baar hara chuki hai.

Adams’ all-round stamp

Georgia Adams set the tone for Hampshire’s chase, launching a 29-ball 53 that kept the asking rate under control even when wickets fell. Warwickshire had posted a competitive 166 for 5, but Hampshire never let the total settle, riding the momentum through the first half of the innings and then holding their nerve to win by four wickets with an over to spare.

Powerplay burst breaks it

The game swung in the powerplay, where Hampshire raced to 53 for 2 at 8.8 an over, immediately flipping the pressure back onto Warwickshire’s attack. That early surge meant Warwickshire’s late charge — 51 runs in the last five overs at 12.2 — didn’t translate into scoreboard control. Even Mary Taylor’s 3 for 35 could only create brief squeezes because Hampshire had already banked enough runs to absorb a couple of quiet overs later.

Adams and Harman set pace

Adams’ innings was the chase’s defining burst, and her 2 for 21 helped prevent Warwickshire from turning a solid platform into something closer to 180. Nancy Harman’s 49 off 26 formed the key 55-run stand with Naomi Dattani, the partnership that steadied Hampshire after early losses. For Warwickshire, Katie George’s 67 off 49 was the backbone of 166, but it needed more control in the first 10 overs to truly stretch Hampshire.

Pre-match edge shows up early

Hampshire came in with stronger recent momentum and it showed in how assertively they played the new ball, refusing to let Warwickshire dictate lengths. Warwickshire’s best chance was to drag the chase into a tense final two overs, but Hampshire’s top-order intent ensured the target was chased in 19 overs rather than becoming a death-overs scrap. The head-to-head advantage Warwickshire held never really materialised because Hampshire won the tempo battle up front.