Central Stags vs Otago Volts Scorecard & Result | Super Smash

SS · at Napier

Finished

#2 · 2 pts · NRR +1.88 · LW

121/10

(19 ov)

#1 · 4 pts · NRR +2.85 · WW

167/9

(20 ov)

Otago won by 46 runs

Date and time 20/01/2007 · 04:00

Competition Super Smash · at Napier

Toss Otago won the toss, elected to batting

Playing XI

J

Jamie HowC —

Geoff Barnett —

P

Peter Ingram —

M

Mathew Sinclair —

G

Greg Hay —

B

Bevan Griggs —

B

Brendon Diamanti —

E

Ewen Thompson —

C

Campbell Furlong —

G

Gregory Hegglun —

L

Lance Hamilton —

Playing XI

C

Craig CummingC —

C

Chris Gaffaney —

A

Aaron Redmond —

Neil Broom —

G

Gareth Hopkins —

G

Greg Todd —

K

Kieran Noema-Barnett —

Nathan McCullum —

B

Bradley Scott —

M

Matt Harvie —

J

James McMillan —

Form — last 4 matches

2W2L50%

NDNorthern Brave 144/10

CDCentral Stags 143/9

13-01-2007 · SS

CDCentral Stags 180/9

CACanterbury Kings 104/10

11-01-2007 · SS

OTOtago Volts 219/4

CDCentral Stags 220/4

26-01-2006 · SS

CDCentral Stags 171/9

CACanterbury Kings 172/4

21-01-2006 · SS

Head-to-head — last 1

CD1–0OT

OTOtago Volts 219/4

CDCentral Stags 220/4

26-01-2006 · SS

Form — last 4 matches

2W2L50%

ND 100runs W

AUAuckland Aces 167/8

OTOtago Volts 181/7

14-01-2007 · SS

OTOtago Volts 185/8

NDNorthern Brave 85/10

11-01-2007 · SS

OTOtago Volts 219/4

CDCentral Stags 220/4

26-01-2006 · SS

CACanterbury Kings 157/4

OTOtago Volts 153/8

12-01-2006 · SS

#TeamPWLPTS

1

Otago 2 2 0 4

2

Central Districts 2 1 1 2

3

Auckland 2 1 1 2

4

Wellington 3 1 2 2

5

Canterbury 2 1 1 2

6

Northern Districts 3 1 2 2

#TeamPWLNRNRRPTS

1

Otago 2 2 0 — +2.850 4

2

Central Districts 2 1 1 — +1.875 2

3

Auckland 2 1 1 — +0.009 2

4

Wellington 3 1 2 — -0.232 2

5

Canterbury 2 1 1 — -1.514 2

6

Northern Districts 3 1 2 — -1.959 2

#TeamLast 5

1

OtagoWW

2

Central DistrictsLW

3

AucklandLW

4

WellingtonWLL

5

CanterburyWL

6

Northern DistrictsLWL

Predictions Stat

0%20%40%60%80%100% 27 Sept16 Oct2 Nov

Method	Accuracy	Record	ROI
ML	68.8%	53 – 24	+4.7%
AI 1	69.6%	55 – 24	+5.2%
AI 2	68.8%	53 – 24	+3.6%
Math	64.1%	50 – 28	-3.1%
Books	68.4%	54 – 25	-0.7%

How we measure this Updated 2 Nov 2026