

Match Prediction
Kent are 8th in the T20B Regular Season on 4 points with a 1W-0L record and +1.350 NRR. Sussex are 7th on 4 points with a 1W-0L record and a higher +2.450 NRR. Both sides come in off wins in their most recent matches. The table is tight on points, so NRR separation is already a factor.
Toss & Conditions
Head-to-Head
Sussex lead the last three head-to-heads 2-1. In the most recent meeting, Kent won a tight chase, getting over the line by 2 wickets with 3 balls remaining. The game was defined by Kent holding their nerve in the final moments of the pursuit rather than letting the chase slip. Across the last three, results have swung between a nail-biter and heavy Sussex wins, so the matchup has shown both volatility and Sussex’s higher hit rate.
Kent
Kent are 8th in the T20B Regular Season with 4 points, a 1W-0L record, and +1.350 NRR. Their latest result was a 27-run win over Middlesex after posting 208/6, a statement of batting depth and scoreboard pressure. Recent results also include a 7-wicket win over Essex, showing they can finish chases cleanly when set up.
Sussex
Sussex are 7th in the T20B Regular Season with 4 points, a 1W-0L record, and +2.450 NRR. Their latest result was a 6-wicket chase win over Essex with 24 balls remaining, a clear sign of control in a high-scoring pursuit. They also have a recent last-ball chase win over Gloucestershire, but that sits alongside a narrow 7-run loss to Surrey.
Playing XI
Key Stats
Verdict
All four models favour Sussex, with the average leaning SUS 55% to KEN 45%. Bookmakers are more cautious, showing near parity at KEN 49% (1.90) vs SUS 51% (1.87). Key stats lean Sussex 4-2, driven by the better NRR, stronger recent head-to-head record, and an edge in the middle and death overs. Kent’s counterweight is a small Elo edge and better powerplay economy, so the game likely turns on who controls the back end.
Forrester’s double act seals it
Dian Forrester turned a Sussex sprint into a Kent win, first by ripping through the middle overs and then by closing out the chase with clean hitting. Sussex still posted 197/6, but Kent never let the required rate run away, finishing 199/3 in 18.2 overs to win by seven wickets with 10 balls in hand. Even after Sussex’s blistering start, Kent’s chase felt increasingly controlled once Crawley settled and Forrester joined him.
Sussex’s middle-overs stall
The match swung in the middle phase, where Sussex went from runaway to restrained. After Daniel Hughes and Tom Clark blasted 92 without loss in the powerplay, Kent’s bowlers hit the hard lengths and took pace off: Sussex managed only 67/4 through the middle overs at 6.7 an over. That slowdown meant their late push was limited to 37/2 at the death, leaving a total that looked big but not untouchable on a true surface.
Crawley anchors, Forrester finishes
Zak Crawley’s 75 off 41 was the chase’s spine, absorbing the early wicket and keeping Kent ahead of the asking rate without reckless risk. His 80-run partnership with Forrester gave Kent the platform to attack late rather than scramble. Forrester’s impact was match-defining: 3/24 in four overs to derail Sussex after the powerplay, then a 35 off 18 that ensured Kent’s finish was emphatic, not anxious. Tom Clark’s powerplay assault briefly threatened to blow the game open, but Kent’s response was sharper.
Pre-match edge, in reverse
The build-up pointed to Sussex’s stronger recent profile and their ability to boss the back end, but it was Kent who owned the key moments after the powerplay. Sussex’s early dominance didn’t translate because the innings became over-reliant on Clark’s 80 off 29, and wickets arrived just as they tried to reset. Kent, expected to be tested at the death, instead surged there — 41 without loss at 17.6 an over — turning a chase into a sprint.
MIMiddlesex
181/8
KEKent
208/6
LALancashire
156/7
KEKent
153/10
KEKent
173/3
ESEssex
172/6
KEKent
165/3
MIMiddlesex
160/5
KEKent
137/8
SOSomerset
138/5
SUSussex
148/10
KEKent
151/8
GLGlamorgan
122/4
KEKent
118/9
KEKent
161/10
SUSussex
195/9
ESEssex
172/10
KEKent
219/3
KEKent
157/9
GLGloucestershire
160/3
KE4
SU6
ESEssex
191/5
SUSussex
192/4
SUSussex
197/7
SUSurrey
204/5
GLGloucestershire
185/5
SUSussex
189/6
HAHampshire
171/4
SUSussex
167/7
ESEssex
148/4
SUSussex
145/10
SUSussex
148/10
KEKent
151/8
SUSussex
134/10
HAHampshire
196/8
KEKent
161/10
SUSussex
195/9
SUSurrey
210/6
SUSussex
162/10
GLGlamorgan
172/10
SUSussex
199/7
NOR
2
2-0
8
SUR
2
2-0
8
DUR
2
2-0
8
SOM
2
2-0
8
GLO
2
2-0
8
YOR
2
2-0
8
SUS
1
1-0
4
KEN
1
1-0
4
WOR
2
1-1
4
GLA
2
0-2
0
DER
2
0-2
0
MID
2
0-2
0
WAR
2
0-2
0
NOT
1
0-1
0
HAM
1
0-1
0
LEI
2
0-2
0
ESS
1
0-1
0
LAN
1
0-1
0
NOR
2
2
0
—
+2.575
8
SUR
2
2
0
—
+1.848
8
DUR
2
2
0
—
+1.757
8
SOM
2
2
0
—
+1.508
8
GLO
2
2
0
—
+1.200
8
YOR
2
2
0
—
+1.133
8
SUS
1
1
0
—
+2.450
4
KEN
1
1
0
—
+1.350
4
WOR
2
1
1
—
-2.050
4
GLA
2
0
2
—
-0.100
0
DER
2
0
2
—
-0.344
0
MID
2
0
2
—
-1.043
0
WAR
2
0
2
—
-1.616
0
NOT
1
0
1
—
-1.892
0
HAM
1
0
1
—
-1.896
0
LEI
2
0
2
—
-1.991
0
ESS
1
0
1
—
-2.450
0
LAN
1
0
1
—
-2.950
0
NORWW
SURWW
DURWW
SOMWW
GLOWW
YORWW
SUSW
KENW
WORWL
GLALL
DERLL
MIDLL
WARLL
NOTL
HAML
LEILL
ESSL
LANL
