

Match Prediction
Lancashire are 18th in the T20 Blast regular season with 0 points after a 0W-1L start and an NRR of -2.950. Nottinghamshire are 14th with 0 points, also 0W-1L, with an NRR of -1.892. Both teams come in off defeats in their most recent matches, so this is an early chance to reset momentum.
Toss & Conditions
Head-to-Head
Lancashire have won 2 of the last 3 meetings with Nottinghamshire. In the most recent clash, Nottinghamshire edged it by 4 wickets with 28 balls remaining after Lancashire were bowled out. The defining detail was Lancashire losing all 10 wickets, leaving a chase that Nottinghamshire finished with time to spare. Across the last three games, results have swung both ways, with Lancashire taking two wins but Nottinghamshire proving they can close tight finishes.
Lancashire
Lancashire are 18th in the T20 Blast regular season on 0 points (0W-1L). Their latest match was a heavy defeat, losing by 59 runs after being bowled out while chasing Surrey’s 213/6. In their recent run of results, they have mixed a narrow chase win with two losses where the batting ended all out.
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire are 14th in the T20 Blast regular season on 0 points (0W-1L). Their latest match was a chase that got away, losing by 7 wickets with 21 balls remaining after posting 167/7 against Yorkshire. Recent results include being bowled out in a 45-run defeat, but also a tight head-to-head win over Lancashire.
Playing XI
Key Stats
Verdict
All four models favour Lancashire, with the average probability at 56% (range 54–60%). Bookmakers diverge, pricing Lancashire at 47% (1.98) vs Nottinghamshire at 53% (1.80). Key stats lean Lancashire 4-2, driven by the head-to-head edge and stronger middle and death-overs economy. The match likely turns on whether Lancashire can avoid another all-out batting collapse and whether Nottinghamshire can convert their better NRR and powerplay control into a complete 20-over performance.
Hartley snaps the chase
Tom Hartley’s left-arm spin was the moment Nottinghamshire couldn’t recover from, as Lancashire defended 208 with a 36-run win. After the visitors flew to 60/1 in the powerplay and briefly had the chase on script, Hartley’s spell in the middle overs dragged the scoring rate down and forced risk. By the time Nottinghamshire tried to reset, the required rate had ballooned and wickets had already done the damage.
Middle overs meltdown
The game was decided between overs 7 and 16, when Nottinghamshire lost the match in a heap: 64/7 in the middle phase. From 60/1, they slid to 124/8, unable to line up Hartley and repeatedly mis-hitting into the longer pockets. Lancashire, by contrast, kept their innings intact through the middle (84/2) and then detonated at the death, smashing 69/1 at 16.6 an over to turn a good total into a daunting one.
McDermott and Hurst set it
Ben McDermott’s 64 off 27 gave Lancashire lift-off, and Matthew Hurst’s 57 off 40 anchored the innings long enough for the finishers to swing freely. Keaton Jennings’ 51 off 31 ensured the run rate never dipped for long. But the defining performance was Hartley’s 3/18 in three overs, the spell that turned Nottinghamshire’s 60/1 start into a chase that never truly restarted.
Pre-match themes play out
The build-up suggested Lancashire’s edge would come from controlling the middle and closing out the back end, and that’s exactly where the gap opened. Nottinghamshire’s early control with ball and bat was real, but their advantage in the powerplay didn’t translate into a complete 20-over chase once spin and matchups came into play. Lancashire also avoided the feared collapse: they absorbed the quieter middle and still had hitters in to cash in late.
SUSurrey
213/6
LALancashire
154/10
LALancashire
159/10
SOSomerset
182/7
LALancashire
156/7
KEKent
153/10
NONottinghamshire
127/6
LALancashire
126/10
YOYorkshire
153/10
LALancashire
174/10
LALancashire
156/7
DUDurham
155/6
LALancashire
217/7
YOYorkshire
236/6
WAWarwickshire
203/9
LALancashire
167/10
LALancashire
178/6
DEDerbyshire
136/6
NONorthamptonshire
177/10
LALancashire
181/5
LA6
NO3
NONottinghamshire
127/6
LALancashire
126/10
LALancashire
216/3
NONottinghamshire
169/10
LALancashire
136/2
NONottinghamshire
131/7
NONottinghamshire
153/8
LALancashire
155/4
NONottinghamshire
149/5
LALancashire
145/10
LALancashire
208/4
NONottinghamshire
186/5
LALancashire
181/4
NONottinghamshire
179/7
NONottinghamshire
91/10
LALancashire
178/7
NONottinghamshire
173/6
LALancashire
166/7
LALancashire
172/4
NONottinghamshire
172/10
NONottinghamshire
167/7
YOYorkshire
169/3
NONottinghamshire
127/6
LALancashire
126/10
WOWorcestershire
206/7
NONottinghamshire
161/10
NONottinghamshire
159/3
DUDurham
156/10
NONottinghamshire
189/9
LELeicestershire
188/2
DUDurham
231/5
NONottinghamshire
182/10
NONorthamptonshire
140/10
NONottinghamshire
164/8
LELeicestershire
160/6
NONottinghamshire
156/10
WAWarwickshire
206/7
NONottinghamshire
212/4
NONottinghamshire
153/9
DEDerbyshire
199/5
NOR
2
2-0
8
SUR
2
2-0
8
DUR
2
2-0
8
SOM
2
2-0
8
GLO
2
2-0
8
YOR
2
2-0
8
SUS
1
1-0
4
KEN
1
1-0
4
WOR
2
1-1
4
GLA
2
0-2
0
DER
2
0-2
0
MID
2
0-2
0
WAR
2
0-2
0
NOT
1
0-1
0
HAM
1
0-1
0
LEI
2
0-2
0
ESS
1
0-1
0
LAN
1
0-1
0
NOR
2
2
0
—
+2.575
8
SUR
2
2
0
—
+1.848
8
DUR
2
2
0
—
+1.757
8
SOM
2
2
0
—
+1.508
8
GLO
2
2
0
—
+1.200
8
YOR
2
2
0
—
+1.133
8
SUS
1
1
0
—
+2.450
4
KEN
1
1
0
—
+1.350
4
WOR
2
1
1
—
-2.050
4
GLA
2
0
2
—
-0.100
0
DER
2
0
2
—
-0.344
0
MID
2
0
2
—
-1.043
0
WAR
2
0
2
—
-1.616
0
NOT
1
0
1
—
-1.892
0
HAM
1
0
1
—
-1.896
0
LEI
2
0
2
—
-1.991
0
ESS
1
0
1
—
-2.450
0
LAN
1
0
1
—
-2.950
0
NORWW
SURWW
DURWW
SOMWW
GLOWW
YORWW
SUSW
KENW
WORWL
GLALL
DERLL
MIDLL
WARLL
NOTL
HAML
LEILL
ESSL
LANL
