

Match Prediction
Hampshire come into this T20B regular-season game ranked 10th with 4 points and a 1W-1L record. Surrey are 2nd with 8 points and are unbeaten at 2W-0L. Hampshire’s last outing was a 30-run win over Essex, while Surrey’s latest result was a 6-wicket chase against Middlesex with 9 balls remaining. The table pressure is immediate: Hampshire are chasing ground, Surrey are defending a fast start.
Toss & Conditions
Head-to-Head
Across the last three meetings, Surrey lead Hampshire 2-1. In the most recent clash, Surrey won decisively by 69 runs after Hampshire were bowled out for 124 while chasing 194. That game was defined by Hampshire losing all 10 wickets in the chase, turning a big target into a one-sided finish. The wider pattern is narrow but clear: Surrey have had the edge in this matchup recently, with Hampshire’s lone win coming via the D/L method.
Hampshire
Hampshire are 10th in the T20B regular season with 4 points, a 1W-1L record, and a -0.133 NRR. Their latest match was a 30-run win over Essex built around a 200/4 total, a reminder they can set a game up with the bat. The recent picture is mixed: a strong bounce-back win after being beaten by Somerset with 22 balls still left.
Surrey
Surrey are 2nd in the T20B regular season with 8 points, a perfect 2W-0L record, and a +1.848 NRR. Their most telling recent result was a 59-run win over Lancashire, pairing a 213/6 total with a complete bowling finish. They followed that by chasing down Middlesex with 9 balls to spare, reinforcing a start that has been both high-scoring and controlled.
Playing XI
Key Stats
Verdict
All four models are in consensus for Surrey, with the average leaning SUR 63% vs HAM 37% (range 59–70% for Surrey). Bookmakers agree, pricing Surrey at 58% (1.62) vs Hampshire at 42% (2.15). Key stats favour Surrey 5-2 overall, driven by their stronger season start and advantage in recent head-to-head results. Hampshire’s path is to flip the script through their powerplay and death-overs economy edges holding up under Surrey’s scoring pace.
Dawson flips the chase
Liam Dawson walked in with Hampshire three down early and batted like the game was his to control, smashing 81 off 46 to drag the chase back on track. Surrey’s 174/8 had enough bite to ask questions, especially after Hampshire slipped to 62/3 in the powerplay, but Dawson’s calm power shifted the pressure back. Hampshire finished 177/5 in 19.1 overs, winning by five wickets with five balls remaining.
Middle overs belong to Dawson
The match swung in the middle overs, where Hampshire stopped the bleeding and then quietly took the chase away. After the early wickets, Dawson and Tristan Stubbs stitched the night’s defining stand: 82 runs, turning a risky start into a manageable finish. Hampshire’s middle phase went at 8.0 an over (80/1), but the real value was the lack of wickets — Surrey couldn’t create a second collapse, and the required rate never spiked into panic.
Dawson leads, Curran fights back
Dawson was the difference: he absorbed the powerplay damage, then accelerated when the field spread, keeping the chase on his terms. Stubbs’ support in that 82-run stand ensured Dawson could pick his moments rather than force them. For Surrey, Tom Curran’s 3 for 33 briefly reopened the contest, and Jordan Clark’s 34 off 12 at the death gave their total late shine, but Hampshire’s bowlers had already done the key work to keep the target chaseable.
Surrey’s edge didn’t translate
Pre-match, Surrey looked better set: stronger recent results, a head-to-head lean, and the sense their batting depth would outpace Hampshire. Instead, Surrey’s innings was repeatedly interrupted — their best partnership was only 37 — so the platform never matched the scoring intent. Even with a lively powerplay at 54/2, the middle overs (81/4) bled momentum, and Hampshire’s tighter spells meant Surrey entered the last five overs without the base for a 190-type finish.
HAHampshire
200/4
ESEssex
170/7
SOSomerset
160/3
HAHampshire
158/10
SOSomerset
195/4
HAHampshire
194/6
NONorthamptonshire
158/7
HAHampshire
155/4
DUDurham
195/6
HAHampshire
221/8
ESEssex
222/6
HAHampshire
220/6
HAHampshire
171/4
SUSussex
167/7
HAHampshire
208/4
GLGlamorgan
113/10
MIMiddlesex
187/8
HAHampshire
188/7
HAHampshire
178/3
SOSomerset
180/6
HA2
SU8
HAHampshire
124/10
SUSurrey
193/6
SUSurrey
141/7
HAHampshire
63/0
SUSurrey
188/5
HAHampshire
183/10
HAHampshire
162/9
SUSurrey
163/5
SUSurrey
124/10
HAHampshire
125/1
HAHampshire
156/4
SUSurrey
157/4
HAHampshire
151/7
SUSurrey
152/6
SUSurrey
228/4
HAHampshire
156/10
HAHampshire
126/8
SUSurrey
146/7
HAHampshire
138/8
SUSurrey
143/1
MIMiddlesex
143/8
SUSurrey
144/4
SUSurrey
213/6
LALancashire
154/10
SUSurrey
147/6
NONorthamptonshire
154/4
SUSussex
197/7
SUSurrey
204/5
MIMiddlesex
181/6
SUSurrey
189/9
SUSurrey
201/6
SOSomerset
134/10
SUSurrey
224/4
GLGlamorgan
222/6
GLGloucestershire
165/9
SUSurrey
193/7
SUSurrey
141/6
ESEssex
145/6
SUSurrey
194/8
MIMiddlesex
119/10
NOR
2
2-0
8
SUR
2
2-0
8
DUR
2
2-0
8
SOM
2
2-0
8
GLO
2
2-0
8
KEN
2
2-0
8
YOR
2
2-0
8
WOR
3
2-1
8
DER
3
1-2
4
SUS
2
1-1
4
HAM
2
1-1
4
LAN
2
1-1
4
GLA
2
0-2
0
MID
2
0-2
0
WAR
3
0-3
0
ESS
2
0-2
0
NOT
2
0-2
0
LEI
3
0-3
0
NOR
2
2
0
—
+2.575
8
SUR
2
2
0
—
+1.848
8
DUR
2
2
0
—
+1.757
8
SOM
2
2
0
—
+1.508
8
GLO
2
2
0
—
+1.200
8
KEN
2
2
0
—
+1.167
8
YOR
2
2
0
—
+1.133
8
WOR
3
2
1
—
-1.211
8
DER
3
1
2
—
+1.198
4
SUS
2
1
1
—
+0.632
4
HAM
2
1
1
—
-0.133
4
LAN
2
1
1
—
-0.500
4
GLA
2
0
2
—
-0.100
0
MID
2
0
2
—
-1.043
0
WAR
3
0
3
—
-1.243
0
ESS
2
0
2
—
-1.864
0
NOT
2
0
2
—
-1.929
0
LEI
3
0
3
—
-2.802
0
NORWW
SURWW
DURWW
SOMWW
GLOWW
KENWW
YORWW
WORWLW
DERLLW
SUSWL
HAMLW
LANLW
GLALL
MIDLL
WARLLL
ESSLL
NOTLL
LEILLL
