

Match Prediction
Yorkshire come into this T20 Blast regular-season game ranked 6th with 12 points and a 3W-1L record. Lancashire are 13th with 4 points and a 1W-2L record. Yorkshire’s last outing ended in a 56-run defeat, while Lancashire’s last game was a 2-wicket loss with 1 ball remaining. The head-to-head has flipped recently, setting up a form-vs-rivalry test.
Toss & Conditions
Head-to-Head
Yorkshire lead the last three meetings 2-1. In the most recent clash, Lancashire won, with Yorkshire being bowled out and falling short in the chase. That game was defined by Yorkshire losing all 10 wickets, which left them without enough runs to defend. Across the last three, results have swung back and forth rather than one side dominating.
Yorkshire
Yorkshire are 6th in the T20 Blast regular season with 12 points and a 3W-1L record. Their recent run has mixed a tight win with a late chase and a heavy setback last time out, when they were beaten by 56 runs. The clearest signal is that their last match ended with them being bowled out, exposing a batting floor that can be punished.
Lancashire
Lancashire are 13th in the T20 Blast regular season with 4 points and a 1W-2L record. Their form has swung from a 36-run win to a last-ball defeat, with the most telling result being the 2-wicket loss with 1 ball remaining that showed how fine their margins are. They’ve had one win in their last three, so they need a cleaner full-game performance.
Playing XI
Key Stats
Verdict
All four models favour Yorkshire, with the average prediction at 60% for YOR. Bookmakers are more cautious, showing near parity at YOR 51% (1.85) vs LAN 49% (1.90). Key stats lean heavily to Yorkshire overall, led by the standings gap and the recent head-to-head edge. The match likely turns on whether Yorkshire avoid another all-out batting collapse and whether Lancashire can reproduce the edge they found in the most recent derby win.
Chohan snaps the chase
Jafer Chohan’s burst of wickets was the moment the Roses game stopped being a contest and became a collapse. After Yorkshire posted 213 for 7, Lancashire briefly hinted at a counterpunch through Liam Livingstone, but Chohan’s strikes in the middle overs ripped out the spine of the chase. The innings ended at 107 in 14.3 overs, handing Yorkshire a 106-run win that felt decisive long before the final ball.
Yorkshire’s middle-overs squeeze
The match was won when Lancashire lost shape between the powerplay and the back end. They stumbled to 42 for 3 in the first six, then slid from a shaky platform to 65 for 7 in the middle phase, leaving too much for too few. With wickets gone, the boundary options dried up and the required rate ballooned; there was no death-overs surge at all. Yorkshire, by contrast, kept their innings intact through the middle and still had the hitters to cash in late.
Bairstow sets, Chohan finishes
Jonny Bairstow’s 73 off 44 was the innings that made Lancashire chase from behind, and his 103-run partnership with William Luxton provided the ballast before the late acceleration. James Wharton’s 35 off 16 supplied the extra punch that pushed the total beyond par. Then Moeen Ali’s 3 for 16 tightened the screws, before Chohan’s 4 for 17 delivered the knockout blows, leaving Livingstone’s 44 off 30 as the lone serious resistance.
Pre-match edge becomes control
The pre-game lean towards Yorkshire was built on recent form and a clear gap in overall performance indicators, but it still depended on avoiding the kind of batting wobble that can swing a derby. Instead, they batted with far more clarity: a fast powerplay (57 for 1) and a stable middle meant Lancashire never got the early inroads they needed. Once defending, Yorkshire’s superior match-ups showed up as pressure bowling rather than a shootout.
YOYorkshire
161/10
GLGloucestershire
217/6
DUDurham
93/10
YOYorkshire
151/9
YOYorkshire
195/8
DEDerbyshire
194/4
NONottinghamshire
167/7
YOYorkshire
169/3
LELeicestershire
185/10
YOYorkshire
188/8
YOYorkshire
153/10
LALancashire
174/10
YOYorkshire
151/9
DEDerbyshire
157/2
LALancashire
217/7
YOYorkshire
236/6
DEDerbyshire
201/3
YOYorkshire
200/6
YOYorkshire
233/6
WOWorcestershire
192/10
YO4
LA5
YOYorkshire
153/10
LALancashire
174/10
LALancashire
217/7
YOYorkshire
236/6
YOYorkshire
173/8
LALancashire
166/8
YOYorkshire
195/6
LALancashire
180/8
YOYorkshire
204/7
LALancashire
208/4
YOYorkshire
209/8
LALancashire
213/5
LALancashire
183/7
YOYorkshire
183/5
LALancashire
131/6
YOYorkshire
128/7
YOYorkshire
180/4
LALancashire
171/8
LALancashire
167/6
YOYorkshire
160/6
LALancashire
145/9
LELeicestershire
146/8
LALancashire
208/4
NONottinghamshire
172/9
SUSurrey
213/6
LALancashire
154/10
LALancashire
159/10
SOSomerset
182/7
LALancashire
156/7
KEKent
153/10
NONottinghamshire
127/6
LALancashire
126/10
YOYorkshire
153/10
LALancashire
174/10
LALancashire
156/7
DUDurham
155/6
LALancashire
217/7
YOYorkshire
236/6
WAWarwickshire
203/9
LALancashire
167/10
NOR
4
4-0
16
HAM
5
4-1
16
GLO
4
3-1
12
SUR
5
3-2
12
KEN
4
3-1
12
YOR
4
3-1
12
DER
5
2-3
8
ESS
4
2-2
8
SOM
3
2-1
8
DUR
4
2-2
8
WOR
3
2-1
8
GLA
3
1-2
4
LAN
3
1-2
4
SUS
4
1-3
4
NOT
4
1-3
4
MID
5
1-4
4
LEI
4
1-3
4
WAR
4
0-4
0
NOR
4
4
0
—
+1.848
16
HAM
5
4
1
—
+0.971
16
GLO
4
3
1
—
+0.940
12
SUR
5
3
2
—
+0.679
12
KEN
4
3
1
—
+0.571
12
YOR
4
3
1
—
+0.527
12
DER
5
2
3
—
+0.856
8
ESS
4
2
2
—
+0.005
8
SOM
3
2
1
—
-0.111
8
DUR
4
2
2
—
-0.309
8
WOR
3
2
1
—
-1.211
8
GLA
3
1
2
—
+0.943
4
LAN
3
1
2
—
-0.375
4
SUS
4
1
3
—
-0.498
4
NOT
4
1
3
—
-0.923
4
MID
5
1
4
—
-1.288
4
LEI
4
1
3
—
-2.007
4
WAR
4
0
4
—
-1.043
0
NORWWWW
HAMLWWWW
GLOWWLW
SURWWLLW
KENWWLW
YORWWWL
DERLLWWL
ESSLLWW
SOMWWL
DURWWLL
WORWLW
GLALLW
LANLWL
SUSWLLL
NOTLLLW
MIDLLWLL
LEILLLW
WARLLLL
