Lees makes the chase simple
Alex Lees set the tone from the first over and never let Leicestershire settle, powering Durham to an eight-wicket win with 30 balls remaining. Chasing 157, Durham’s openers came out swinging, and even when two wickets fell in the middle overs, the target already looked small. Lees’ 80 off 44 was the defining innings, turning what could have been a tricky chase into a controlled finish.
Powerplay blitz breaks Leicestershire
The match was effectively decided in the first six overs of Durham’s reply. They surged to 85/0 in the powerplay at 14.2 an over, wiping out more than half the target before Leicestershire could find a matchup or a length. That burst meant the rest of the chase only needed management: even with a quieter middle phase of 75/2, Durham were always ahead of the rate and the fielding side’s options.
Lees and Clark set the tone
Lees was the standout, mixing clean hitting with smart placement as boundaries kept arriving whenever Leicestershire tried to tighten. Graham Clark’s 38 off 23 ensured the tempo never dipped, and their 113-run partnership removed any scoreboard pressure. With the ball, Callum Parkinson’s 2 for 23 and Nathan Sowter’s 2 for 30 were key in keeping Leicestershire to 156, while Matty Potts’ 2 for 41 came despite a costly spell—proof that Durham’s batting had already won them the margin.
Leicestershire’s stuttered start hurts
With pre-match indicators thin, the game still followed a familiar T20 pattern: early wickets and a middling total invite a dominant chase. Leicestershire’s 50/3 powerplay left them rebuilding rather than pressing, and their middle overs (71/5) never produced the one big partnership to change the par score. The late lift—35 without loss at the death—gave them something to bowl at, but it wasn’t enough to offset the damage Durham did up front.
YOYorkshire
207/4
LELeicestershire
166/9
LELeicestershire
135/10
NONottinghamshire
209/4
LELeicestershire
156/7
LALancashire
160/5
LELeicestershire
147/8
YOYorkshire
135/10
SUSussex
179/10
LELeicestershire
180/6
LALancashire
145/9
LELeicestershire
146/8
LELeicestershire
145/10
DEDerbyshire
230/5
DUDurham
150/4
LELeicestershire
148/8
LELeicestershire
164/4
WOWorcestershire
188/9
LELeicestershire
185/10
YOYorkshire
188/8
LE6DU4DUDurham
150/4
LELeicestershire
148/8
LELeicestershire
193/8
DUDurham
187/7
DUDurham
130/8
LELeicestershire
140/8
LELeicestershire
176/7
DUDurham
178/3
LELeicestershire
174/4
DUDurham
172/4
DUDurham
168/6
LELeicestershire
169/3
DUDurham
106/10
LELeicestershire
157/9
LELeicestershire
130/10
DUDurham
184/8
DUDurham
115/4
LELeicestershire
88/2
LELeicestershire
168/9
DUDurham
170/8
DUDurham
164/6
NONottinghamshire
166/8
YOYorkshire
208/5
DUDurham
205/9
MIMiddlesex
118/10
DUDurham
218/6
DUDurham
128/2
LALancashire
130/3
DUDurham
138/8
NONorthamptonshire
145/9
NONottinghamshire
157/4
DUDurham
156/8
DUDurham
93/10
YOYorkshire
151/9
DUDurham
150/4
LELeicestershire
148/8
DEDerbyshire
197/8
DUDurham
203/8
DUDurham
195/6
HAHampshire
221/8
NOR
9
8-1
32
HAM
9
7-2
28
NOT
10
7-3
28
YOR
10
6-3
26
GLO
10
6-4
24
WOR
10
6-4
24
GLA
9
5-4
20
SUR
9
5-4
20
ESS
10
5-5
20
LAN
10
4-5
18
WAR
10
4-6
16
SOM
9
4-5
16
KEN
10
4-6
16
DER
9
2-5
12
DUR
9
3-6
12
LEI
9
3-6
12
SUS
9
2-7
8
MID
9
2-7
8
NOR
9
8
1
—
+1.288
32
HAM
9
7
2
—
+0.635
28
NOT
10
7
3
—
+0.188
28
YOR
10
6
3
—
+0.883
26
GLO
10
6
4
—
+0.556
24
WOR
10
6
4
—
+0.038
24
GLA
9
5
4
—
+0.320
20
SUR
9
5
4
—
+0.311
20
ESS
10
5
5
—
+0.081
20
LAN
10
4
5
—
-0.543
18
WAR
10
4
6
—
+0.338
16
SOM
9
4
5
—
+0.121
16
KEN
10
4
6
—
-0.474
16
DER
9
2
5
—
+0.398
12
DUR
9
3
6
—
+0.335
12
LEI
9
3
6
—
-1.427
12
SUS
9
2
7
—
-1.487
8
MID
9
2
7
—
-1.709
8
NORWWWWL
HAMWWWLW
NOTWWWWW
YORLLDWW
GLOWLLWL
WORLLWWW
GLALWWWL
SURWLWWL
ESSWLLWL
LANWWWLD
WARWWWLW
SOMLLWLW
KENLLWLL
DERLLDLD
DURLLWLL
LEIWWLLL
SUSLWLLL
MIDLLLLW