

Match Prediction
Nottinghamshire start this round 18th with 0 points and a 0W-3L record in the T20B regular season. Durham are 7th with 8 points and a 2W-1L record. Notts come in off three straight defeats, while Durham have taken two wins from their last three. The matchup also has recent edge: Durham have won two of the last three head-to-head meetings.
Toss & Conditions
Head-to-Head
Across the last three meetings, Durham lead 2-1. In the most recent clash, Nottinghamshire won by 7 wickets with 8 balls remaining after bowling Durham out for 156. That game was defined by Durham being dismissed inside their 20 overs, leaving a chase that Notts finished with time in hand. The wider pattern still leans Durham, with wins in the two meetings before that.
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire are 18th with 0 points in the T20B regular season, sitting at 0W-3L. Their last three games have all been defeats, and the trend has been opponents posting big totals and Notts falling short in reply. The clearest snapshot is the latest loss to Derbyshire, where Nottinghamshire conceded 234/4 and still couldn’t chase it down despite reaching 211/6.
Durham
Durham are 7th with 8 points in the T20B regular season, with a 2W-1L record. Their last three results show volatility: two wins either side of a heavy defeat. The most telling result is the latest game, where they were bowled out for 93 and lost by 58 runs to Yorkshire.
Playing XI
Key Stats
Verdict
All four models favour Durham, with Durham projected at 64–73% and 68% on average. Bookmakers also lean Durham but are closer to a coin-flip, pricing Durham at 53% (1.78) vs Nottinghamshire at 47% (2.00). Key stats favour Durham 7-1 overall; the gap in season performance and recent results points their way. Nottinghamshire’s path is to flip the script with a cleaner bowling effort after conceding repeated big totals.
Munsey flips the script
George Munsey set the tone for Nottinghamshire’s upset, absorbing an early wobble and then ripping the chase open with clean, straight hitting. Durham had just enough late resistance to make 157 feel chaseable, but Munsey’s 88 off 52 ensured it never became a scramble. Nottinghamshire got home by six wickets with 16 balls remaining, turning a game that began with Durham on top into a controlled pursuit.
Powerplay damage, lasting cost
The match was effectively decided in Durham’s first six overs. Reduced to 41/4 in the powerplay, they spent the rest of the innings rebuilding rather than dictating, even though the death overs briefly lifted them (44 runs at 10.6 an over). That early collapse meant their best stand was only 43, and 156/8 always looked light once Nottinghamshire blasted 63/2 in their own powerplay.
Linde, then Munsey
George Linde’s 2 for 19 was the control act that stopped Durham stabilising, while Olly Stone’s 2 for 25 kept wickets falling when a platform was needed. Munsey did the heavy lifting in the chase, and the decisive moment came as the 87-run partnership after the powerplay drained the pressure and pushed Durham’s bowlers out of their preferred end-overs plan.
Durham’s edge meets a new pitch
All the pre-match pointers leaned Durham: stronger season numbers, better recent form, and a bowling profile built to squeeze at the death. But this game flipped on the simplest T20 truth: lose the powerplay and you’re defending from behind. Nottinghamshire, criticised for leaking big totals, instead struck early and forced Durham into catch-up mode, then made the chase easy by winning the new-ball phase with the bat.
DEDerbyshire
234/4
NONottinghamshire
211/6
LALancashire
208/4
NONottinghamshire
172/9
NONottinghamshire
167/7
YOYorkshire
169/3
NONottinghamshire
127/6
LALancashire
126/10
WOWorcestershire
206/7
NONottinghamshire
161/10
NONottinghamshire
159/3
DUDurham
156/10
NONottinghamshire
189/9
LELeicestershire
188/2
DUDurham
231/5
NONottinghamshire
182/10
NONorthamptonshire
140/10
NONottinghamshire
164/8
LELeicestershire
160/6
NONottinghamshire
156/10
NO8
DU2
NONottinghamshire
159/3
DUDurham
156/10
DUDurham
231/5
NONottinghamshire
182/10
DUDurham
160/6
NONottinghamshire
130/9
NONottinghamshire
187/7
DUDurham
161/9
DUDurham
168/6
NONottinghamshire
171/5
NONottinghamshire
184/6
DUDurham
183/8
DUDurham
96/5
NONottinghamshire
98/9
NONottinghamshire
221/4
DUDurham
143/10
DUDurham
182/8
NONottinghamshire
195/5
NONottinghamshire
150/6
DUDurham
132/10
DUDurham
93/10
YOYorkshire
151/9
DUDurham
150/4
LELeicestershire
148/8
DEDerbyshire
197/8
DUDurham
203/8
DUDurham
195/6
HAHampshire
221/8
DUDurham
204/1
NONorthamptonshire
203/5
LALancashire
156/7
DUDurham
155/6
NONottinghamshire
159/3
DUDurham
156/10
DUDurham
182/7
WAWarwickshire
174/8
DUDurham
231/5
NONottinghamshire
182/10
DUDurham
193/4
YOYorkshire
130/10
NOR
3
3-0
12
YOR
3
3-0
12
DER
4
2-2
8
SUR
3
2-1
8
GLO
3
2-1
8
HAM
3
2-1
8
DUR
3
2-1
8
SOM
3
2-1
8
KEN
3
2-1
8
WOR
3
2-1
8
GLA
3
1-2
4
SUS
2
1-1
4
ESS
3
1-2
4
LAN
3
1-2
4
LEI
4
1-3
4
MID
2
0-2
0
WAR
3
0-3
0
NOT
3
0-3
0
NOR
3
3
0
—
+2.316
12
YOR
3
3
0
—
+1.657
12
DER
4
2
2
—
+1.183
8
SUR
3
2
1
—
+1.049
8
GLO
3
2
1
—
+0.336
8
HAM
3
2
1
—
+0.112
8
DUR
3
2
1
—
-0.007
8
SOM
3
2
1
—
-0.111
8
KEN
3
2
1
—
-0.277
8
WOR
3
2
1
—
-1.211
8
GLA
3
1
2
—
+0.943
4
SUS
2
1
1
—
+0.632
4
ESS
3
1
2
—
-0.155
4
LAN
3
1
2
—
-0.375
4
LEI
4
1
3
—
-2.007
4
MID
2
0
2
—
-1.043
0
WAR
3
0
3
—
-1.243
0
NOT
3
0
3
—
-1.697
0
NORWWW
YORWWW
DERLLWW
SURWWL
GLOWWL
HAMLWW
DURWWL
SOMWWL
KENWWL
WORWLW
GLALLW
SUSWL
ESSLLW
LANLWL
LEILLLW
MIDLL
WARLLL
NOTLLL
