Toss & Conditions

Head-to-Head

In the last 1 meeting, Lancashire W lead 1-0. The most recent clash was earlier this month, and Lancashire won by 6 wickets with 17 balls remaining. It was decided by Lancashire completing a chase, finishing on 163/4 after Yorkshire posted 160/7. With only one recent head-to-head on record here, there is no broader pattern beyond Lancashire taking the latest result.

YOYorkshire W 160/7

LALancashire W 163/4

2026-07-01 · LAN-W won by 6 wickets (with 17 balls remaining)

Lancashire W

Lancashire W are 9th in the T20BW Regular Season with 9 points. Their recent form has dipped, with losses in their last two matches after a win over Yorkshire earlier this month. The clearest warning sign is that they were bowled out for 79 and 131 in those two defeats.

LALancashire W 131/10

HAHampshire W 135/1

2026-07-05 · HAM-W won by 9 wickets (with 33 balls remaining)

LALancashire W 79/10

DUDurham W 80/3

2026-07-03 · DUR-W won by 7 wickets (with 39 balls remaining)

LALancashire W 163/4

YOYorkshire W 160/7

2026-07-01 · LAN-W won by 6 wickets (with 17 balls remaining)

Yorkshire W

Yorkshire W are 8th in the T20BW Regular Season with 10 points. Their recent form has lifted, winning their last two matches after losing to Lancashire earlier this month. The standout result is a tight chase win over Warwickshire, sealed with 3 balls remaining.

YOYorkshire W 165/5

WAWarwickshire W 161/3

2026-07-05 · YOR won by 5 wickets (with 3 balls remaining)

YOYorkshire W 210/4

SOSomerset W 199/5

2026-07-03 · YOR won by 11 runs

YOYorkshire W 160/7

LALancashire W 163/4

2026-07-01 · LAN-W won by 6 wickets (with 17 balls remaining)

Playing XI

Key Stats

Verdict

Models are split, but the average leans Lancashire W at 52% vs Yorkshire W at 48%. Bookmakers also shade Lancashire W, pricing them at 53% (1.80) vs Yorkshire W at 47% (2.00). Key stats edge Lancashire 5-3, driven by better NRR and stronger economy splits, while Yorkshire bring the better recent win-rate into this one. The match likely turns on whether Lancashire’s batting rebounds from two recent all-out defeats or Yorkshire’s current momentum holds.

Campbell’s powerplay blitz

Ami Campbell took control before Lancashire W could settle, driving Yorkshire W into a match-winning position that their bowlers never let slip. Her 64 off 42 anchored a brisk 162/6, and when Lancashire threatened to build a platform, Holly May Garton’s incisive spell cut through the chase. Lancashire finished 133/8, leaving Yorkshire W 29-run winners after a game that swung briefly but was largely dictated by Yorkshire’s early tempo.

62 without loss set it up

The decisive phase was the first six overs of Yorkshire’s innings. They surged to 62/0 at 10.3 an over, forcing Lancashire to defend with fields back far earlier than planned and turning every dot ball into pressure. Even though Yorkshire slowed in the middle overs (66/4), that powerplay cushion meant the innings could absorb wickets without panic. Lancashire’s chase never found a comparable launch: 42/2 in the powerplay left them needing a big middle, but they slipped to 98/6 through the mid-overs and were left chasing rate and wickets.

Garton and Jonassen finish job

Campbell’s 69-run opening stand with Erin Thomas gave Yorkshire their launchpad, and Jess Jonassen’s 33 off 21 ensured the total stayed above par after the middle-overs wobble. In the chase, Garton’s 3/23 was the defining intervention, breaking partnerships just as Lancashire tried to regroup. Darcey Carter and Tilly Kesteven added 43 to keep hope alive, but with the asking rate climbing, their stand couldn’t turn into the decisive surge Lancashire needed.

Pre-match lean flipped quickly

The build-up slightly favoured Lancashire on balance, largely on steadier run-rate trends and bowling splits, but Yorkshire arrived with sharper recent momentum and played like it from ball one. The match-up hinged on whether Lancashire’s batting could rebound; instead, they were put behind the game by Yorkshire’s early hitting and then squeezed by disciplined lengths. Once the required rate climbed past eight, Lancashire’s risk-taking brought wickets rather than acceleration.